Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • REC Home
  • Apply
    • REC Services Rate Card & Policies
    • LPFM Construction Completed
    • LPFM License Modification
    • New FM Booster Station
    • New Class D FM Station in Alaska
    • New Low Power FM (LPFM) Station
  • Initiatives
    • RM-11846: Rural NCE Stations
    • RM-11909: LP-250 / Simple 250
    • WIDE-FM
    • RM-11952: Translator Reform
    • RM-11843: 8 Meter Ham Band
    • PACE - LPFM Compliance
  • Services
  • Tools
    • Today's FCC Activity
    • Broadcast Data Query
    • Field strength curves
    • Runway slope
    • Tower finder
    • FM MODEL-RF Exposure Study
    • More tools
    • Developers - API
  • LPFM
    • Learn about LPFM
      • Basics of LPFM
      • Self Inspection Checklist
      • Underwriting Compliance Guide
      • Frequently Asked Questions
      • FCC Rules for LPFM
      • HD Radio for LPFM
      • Transmitters certified for LPFM
      • Interference from FM translators
      • RadioDNS for LPFM Stations
    • 2023 Window REC Client Portal
    • myLPFM - LPFM Station Management
    • LPFM Station Directory
    • Spare call signs
    • REC PACE Program
    • More about LPFM
  • Reference
    • Pending FCC Applications
    • FCC Filing Fees
    • Radio License Renewal Deadlines
    • FCC Record/FCC Reports
    • Pirate Radio Enforcement Data
    • Premises Info System (PREMIS)
    • ITU and other international documents
    • Recent FCC Callsign Activity
    • FCC Enforcement Actions
    • Federal Register
    • Recent CAP/Weather Alerts
    • Legal Unlicensed Broadcasting
    • More reference tools
  • LPFM Window
  • About
    • REC in the Media
    • Supporting REC's Efforts
    • Recommendations
    • FCC Filings and Presentations
    • Our Jingles
    • REC Radio History Project
    • Delmarva FM / Riverton Radio Project
    • J1 Radio / Japanese Broadcasting
    • Japan Earthquake Data
    • REC Systems Status
    • eLMS: Enhanced LMS Data Project
    • Open Data at REC
    • Our Objectives
  • Contact

Breadcrumb

  • Home

Operational Status

Michi on YouTube

Most popular

fcc.today - real time updates on application activity from the FCC Media Bureau.  fccdata.org - the internet's most comprehensive FCC database lookup tool.  myLPFM.com - Low Power FM channel search and station management tool.  REC Broadcast Services - professional LPFM and FM translator filing services. 

Other tools & info

  • Filing Window Tracking
  • Enforcement Actions
  • REC Advisory Letters
  • FAQ-Knowledge Base
  • U/D Ratio Calculator
  • Propagation Curves
  • Runway Slope/REC TOWAIR
  • Coordinate Conversion
  • PREMIS: Address Profile
  • Spare Call Sign List
  • FCC (commercial) filing fees
  • Class D FM stations in Alaska
  • ARRR: Pirate radio notices
  • Unlicensed broadcasting (part 15)
  • FMmap - broadcast atlas
  • Federal Register
  • Rate Card & Policies
  • REC system status
  • Server Status
  • Complete site index
Cirrus Streaming - Radio Streaming Services - Podcasting & On-demand - Mobile Apps - Advertising
Select FAQ Category:

FAQ: If an LPFM can't be placed at a location, does that mean a translator can't go there either?

Not necessarily. There are several reasons for this. The way that FM translators protect other broadcast facilities (full power, LPFM and other translators) is totally different than how LPFM stations protect other facilities.

FM translators use a contour overlap model where LPFM uses distance separation.

To get yourself familiarized with contours, read this FAQ article.

When LPFM was created, the FCC used a simplifed method of the spacing of stations. They originally rejected the concept of contour overlap for LPFM because, in part, the high number of LPFM applications accepted would put a burden on FCC staff if they are written with contours. Of course, three years later, the Commission would take over 15,000 FM translator applications using contours.

The FCC took the hypothetical maximum facility for each station class. Translators were divided into three "sub-classes" based on the service contour size. To determine the minimum distance required, the FCC took the size of the LPFM interfering contour and added the protected contour for the other station. Also, for full power domestic FM stations, the FCC added an additional 20 km to the distance as a "buffer zone". The original intention was to assure that if a full power station was to make a short move, it will not impact the LPFM station.

If an FM translator can't fit in a particular location, a directional antenna or reduced power can be used to "sqeeze" in the translator. Like with LPFM stations, translators can exist inside of the interference contours of full power stations.

Real world example

Here in Riverton, MD where REC is, let's say I wanted to use 103.5.

Under the 100 watt LPFM rules, 103.5 would not be available due to short spacing to WESR and WJKI:

These distance separations are now in statute and would require an act of Congress to change.

For LPFM, there is no second-adjacent channel short spacing on 103.5.

Now, let's try to put a 250 watt non-directional translator at the same location.

Co-channel:

In this case, WTOP-FM is a Class B station and WJKI is a Class A. The curves for those stations are the service contours. 54 dBu for WTOP and 60 dBu for WJKI. The green and red circles are the 34 dBu and 40 dBu interfering contours around the proposed translator in Riverton. Notice how there is no overlap?

Let's now look at the first-adjacent channel:

The full power stations (WESR, WMGM and WXCY) are all Class B stations. Notice that there is no overlap of the 48 dBu interfering contour (gold circle around Riverton) and the service contours of these stations and that there is no overlap between the 54 dBu interfering contour of the proposed Riverton translator and the W279BH translator (the pink circles).

Now, of course, the proposed Riverton station would be well inside the interference contours of various stations:

Now that I look at this, I probably would not want to use 103.5 becuase of the incoming from WKJI, especially now that they have an application to move closer to me.

So this brings up another thing to remember, even though there may be a slither of space for a translator, it does not always mean that the channel is desirable for them. Those of us in LPFM experience the same thing.

LPFM enforcement and interference
FM Translators
Thu, 02/04/2016 - 12:00

REC Essentials

  • FCC.TODAY
  • FCCdata.org
  • myLPFM Station Management
  • REC site map

The More You Know...

  • Unlicensed Broadcasting
  • Class D Stations for Alaska
  • Broadcasting in Japan
  • Our Jingles

Other REC sites

  • J1 Radio
  • REC Delmarva FM
  • Japan Earthquake Information
  • API for developers

But wait, there's more!

  • Join NFCB
  • Pacifica Network
  • LPFM Wiki
  • Report a bug with an REC system

Copyright © REC Networks - All Rights Reserved
EU cookie policy

Please show your support by using the Ko-Fi link at the bottom of the page. Thank you for supporting REC's efforts!