Skip to main content
Home

Main navigation

  • REC Home
  • Apply
    • REC Services Rate Card & Policies
    • LPFM Construction Completed
    • LPFM License Modification
    • New FM Booster Station
    • New Class D FM Station in Alaska
    • New Low Power FM (LPFM) Station
  • Initiatives
    • RM-11846: Rural NCE Stations
    • RM-11909: LP-250 / Simple 250
    • WIDE-FM
    • RM-11952: Translator Reform
    • RM-11843: 8 Meter Ham Band
    • PACE - LPFM Compliance
  • Services
  • Tools
    • Today's FCC Activity
    • Broadcast Data Query
    • Field strength curves
    • Runway slope
    • Tower finder
    • FM MODEL-RF Exposure Study
    • More tools
    • Developers - API
  • LPFM
    • Learn about LPFM
      • Basics of LPFM
      • Self Inspection Checklist
      • Underwriting Compliance Guide
      • Frequently Asked Questions
      • FCC Rules for LPFM
      • HD Radio for LPFM
      • Transmitters certified for LPFM
      • Interference from FM translators
      • RadioDNS for LPFM Stations
    • 2023 Window REC Client Portal
    • myLPFM - LPFM Station Management
    • LPFM Station Directory
    • Spare call signs
    • REC PACE Program
    • More about LPFM
  • Reference
    • Pending FCC Applications
    • FCC Filing Fees
    • Radio License Renewal Deadlines
    • FCC Record/FCC Reports
    • Pirate Radio Enforcement Data
    • Premises Info System (PREMIS)
    • ITU and other international documents
    • Recent FCC Callsign Activity
    • FCC Enforcement Actions
    • Federal Register
    • Recent CAP/Weather Alerts
    • Legal Unlicensed Broadcasting
    • More reference tools
  • LPFM Window
  • About
    • REC in the Media
    • Supporting REC's Efforts
    • Recommendations
    • FCC Filings and Presentations
    • Our Jingles
    • REC Radio History Project
    • Delmarva FM / Riverton Radio Project
    • J1 Radio / Japanese Broadcasting
    • Japan Earthquake Data
    • REC Systems Status
    • eLMS: Enhanced LMS Data Project
    • Open Data at REC
    • Our Objectives
  • Contact

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • FAQ: How come RM-11749 recommends the same distance separations for LP-250 stations as it does for LP-100?

Operational Status

Michi on YouTube

Most popular

fcc.today - real time updates on application activity from the FCC Media Bureau.  fccdata.org - the internet's most comprehensive FCC database lookup tool.  myLPFM.com - Low Power FM channel search and station management tool.  REC Broadcast Services - professional LPFM and FM translator filing services. 

Other tools & info

  • Filing Window Tracking
  • Enforcement Actions
  • REC Advisory Letters
  • FAQ-Knowledge Base
  • U/D Ratio Calculator
  • Propagation Curves
  • Runway Slope/REC TOWAIR
  • Coordinate Conversion
  • PREMIS: Address Profile
  • Spare Call Sign List
  • FCC (commercial) filing fees
  • Class D FM stations in Alaska
  • ARRR: Pirate radio notices
  • Unlicensed broadcasting (part 15)
  • FMmap - broadcast atlas
  • Federal Register
  • Rate Card & Policies
  • REC system status
  • Server Status
  • Complete site index
Cirrus Streaming - Radio Streaming Services - Podcasting & On-demand - Mobile Apps - Advertising
Select FAQ Category:

FAQ: How come RM-11749 recommends the same distance separations for LP-250 stations as it does for LP-100?

The similar distance separations for LP-250 are in respect to co-channel and first-adjacent channel and only towards full-power FM stations within the United States.

This is possible because when the FCC created LPFM in 2000, they included a "buffer zone" around "full-facility" service contour of the full-power station class.

For example, the maximum facility for a full-power Class A FM station is 6,000 watts at 100 meters height above average terrain. This creates a service contour of 28.3 kilometers from the transmitter site over flat terrain.

In addition to that 28.3 km, the FCC added another 20 km to the service contour. The additional "buffer zone" was intended to allow for full-power FM stations to be allowed to relocate by causing minimal impact to LPFM stations. So in the case of the Class-A station, we now have a hypothetical 48.3 km service contour.

Include the interference contours of an LP-100 facility which is 18.6 km for co-channel and 8.0 km for first-adjacent channel.

For co-channel, if you add 28.3 for the service contour, 20.0 for the buffer-zone and 18.6 for the LPFM interference contour, you get 66.9 which rounds up to 67 km, the minimum distance separation for a class-A. If the FCC never enacted the buffer zone, LPFM stations could be placed as close as 47 km to Class-A stations (but the number of inward interference issues would have skyrocketed).

When the Local Community Radio Act was passed in 2011, section 3(b) of the LCRA set in stone the minimum distance separations in effect at the time of the legislation's passage, which includes the buffer zone.

When the FCC proposed LP-250 in 2012, it proposed the same co-channel and first-adjacent channel distance separations as LP-100. This was an acknolwedgement that the FCC was willing to break into the buffer zone.

Back to the same LPFM to Class A example, at LP-250, the interference contour of the LPFM is now 23.8 km for co-channel and 10.1 km for first-adjacent channel. If we were to include the full 20 km buffer zone, the minimum distance separation for a Class A would increase from 67 to 72 km. Instead, the FCC went the other way by allowing the additional interference contour to be absorbed by the buffer zone.

Therefore, in respect to Class A on co-channel, the buffer zone has been reduced from 20 km to 14.8 km and for first-adjacent channel, 17.9 km.

Miscellaneous questions
Thu, 05/14/2015 - 12:00

REC Essentials

  • FCC.TODAY
  • FCCdata.org
  • myLPFM Station Management
  • REC site map

The More You Know...

  • Unlicensed Broadcasting
  • Class D Stations for Alaska
  • Broadcasting in Japan
  • Our Jingles

Other REC sites

  • J1 Radio
  • REC Delmarva FM
  • Japan Earthquake Information
  • API for developers

But wait, there's more!

  • Join NFCB
  • Pacifica Network
  • LPFM Wiki
  • Report a bug with an REC system

Copyright © REC Networks - All Rights Reserved
EU cookie policy

Please show your support by using the Ko-Fi link at the bottom of the page. Thank you for supporting REC's efforts!